US Supreme Court Rules that GPS Tracking Requires a Warrant

Friday, 27 January, 2012

via Bruce Schneier (with multiple links), “US Supreme Court Rules that GPS Tracking Requires a Warrant

United States v. Jones (2012), Court ruling (PDF)

United States v. Jones: Privacy in Public Space? Piece it all Together and You Get 5. – By Priscilla Smith, Nabiha Syed & Albert Wong, Information Society Project at Yale Law School

Wired, “Supreme Court Court Rejects Willy-Nilly GPS Tracking


iPhones Tracking questions to Steve Jobs from US Senator Al Franken

Thursday, 21 April, 2011

US Senator Al Franken asks the following questions in an letter to Apple CEO Steve Jobs,

1. Why does Apple collect and compile this location data? Why did Apple choose to initiate tracking this data in its iOS 4 operating system?

2. Does Apple collect and compile this location data for laptops?

3. How is this data generated? (GPS, cell tower triangulation, WiFi triangulation, etc.)

4. How frequently is a user’s location recorded? What triggers the creation of a record of someone’s location?

5. How precise is this location data? Can it track a user’s location to 50 meters, 100 meters, etc.?

6. Why is this data not encrypted? What steps will Apple take to encrypt this data?

7. Why were Apple consumers never affirmatively informed of the collection and retention of their location data in this manner? Why did Apple not seek affirmative consent before doing so?

8. Does Apple believe that this conduct is permissible under the terms of its privacy policy? See Apple Privacy Policy at “Location-Based Services” (accessed on April 20, 2011), available at http://www.apple.com/privacy

9. To whom, if anyone, including Apple, has this data been disclosed? When and why were these disclosures made?

[HT Information Week “iPhone Tracking Only Tip Of Security Iceberg”]


%d bloggers like this: