<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Richard Feynman &#8211; Great minds of our time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kempton.wordpress.com/2006/11/26/richard-feynman-great-minds-of-our-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kempton.wordpress.com/2006/11/26/richard-feynman-great-minds-of-our-time/</link>
	<description>Kempton calls himself &#34;ideas Revolutionary&#34; and tries to make mistakes faster.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 03:39:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Feynman: Take the world from another point of view &#171; Kempton &#8211; ideas Revolutionary</title>
		<link>http://kempton.wordpress.com/2006/11/26/richard-feynman-great-minds-of-our-time/#comment-43809</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Feynman: Take the world from another point of view &#171; Kempton &#8211; ideas Revolutionary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kempton.wordpress.com/2006/11/26/great-minds-of-our-time-richard-feynman/#comment-43809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Feynman: Take the world from another point of&#160;view  Richard Feynman is one of my &#8220;Great Minds of Our Time&#8220;. The following is Feynman: Take the world from [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Feynman: Take the world from another point of&nbsp;view  Richard Feynman is one of my &#8220;Great Minds of Our Time&#8220;. The following is Feynman: Take the world from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 假如我是一本書 &#8211; 兩周一聚(21) &#171; 加燦 指指點點 &#8211; ca 8 hk</title>
		<link>http://kempton.wordpress.com/2006/11/26/richard-feynman-great-minds-of-our-time/#comment-43183</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[假如我是一本書 &#8211; 兩周一聚(21) &#171; 加燦 指指點點 &#8211; ca 8 hk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 07:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kempton.wordpress.com/2006/11/26/great-minds-of-our-time-richard-feynman/#comment-43183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] (auto-bio), Bill Gates, 查良鏞, 林思齊, Steve Jobs, Kurt Gödel, I. M. Pei, Richard Feynman (bio &amp; books), Milton &amp; Rose Friedman, James Dyson (auto-bio), Dick Haskayne (auto-bio), Warren Buffett [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (auto-bio), Bill Gates, 查良鏞, 林思齊, Steve Jobs, Kurt Gödel, I. M. Pei, Richard Feynman (bio &amp; books), Milton &amp; Rose Friedman, James Dyson (auto-bio), Dick Haskayne (auto-bio), Warren Buffett [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hello nanoAlberta ! &#171; Kempton - ideas Revolutionary</title>
		<link>http://kempton.wordpress.com/2006/11/26/richard-feynman-great-minds-of-our-time/#comment-42265</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hello nanoAlberta ! &#171; Kempton - ideas Revolutionary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kempton.wordpress.com/2006/11/26/great-minds-of-our-time-richard-feynman/#comment-42265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] in nanotechnology is an area that has fascinated me for many years. I first read about it from Richard Feynman&#8217;s book talking about his 1959 lecture &#8220;There&#8217;s Plenty of Room at the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in nanotechnology is an area that has fascinated me for many years. I first read about it from Richard Feynman&#8217;s book talking about his 1959 lecture &#8220;There&#8217;s Plenty of Room at the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My wish on this Father&#8217;s Day &#171; Kempton - ideas Revolutionary</title>
		<link>http://kempton.wordpress.com/2006/11/26/richard-feynman-great-minds-of-our-time/#comment-40372</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[My wish on this Father&#8217;s Day &#171; Kempton - ideas Revolutionary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 14:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kempton.wordpress.com/2006/11/26/great-minds-of-our-time-richard-feynman/#comment-40372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] suspect people like Randy Pauch, Tim Russert, Richard Feynman, Warren Buffett, Stephen N. S. Cheung are equally proud of their professional accomplishments and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] suspect people like Randy Pauch, Tim Russert, Richard Feynman, Warren Buffett, Stephen N. S. Cheung are equally proud of their professional accomplishments and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommi</title>
		<link>http://kempton.wordpress.com/2006/11/26/richard-feynman-great-minds-of-our-time/#comment-2132</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tommi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 12:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kempton.wordpress.com/2006/11/26/great-minds-of-our-time-richard-feynman/#comment-2132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately, Richard Feynman, as creative and ingenious as this man was, imho, must always contain a footnote (preferably in bold letters): one of the men who created the first atomic weapon. 
-tgs-

********

Hi Tommi,

You are right that Richard Feynman was on the team that created the atomic bomb. But I think we need to remember that the Germans were also working on the bomb at that time. Our world would have been very different if the Germans got there first and used it against the free world.

Cheers,
Kempton

P.S. Here is a story partially reflecting how Feynman felt about the bomb. Instead of re-typing similar passage from a different book, I am &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.karenika.com/book/pleasure.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;copying from this blogger&#039;s text&lt;/a&gt;. This Feynman story is essentially the same as what I read in another book.

&quot;After the thing {the atom bomb} went off and we heard about it, there was tremendous excitement at Los Alamos. Everybody had parties, we all ran around. I sat on the end of a jeep and beat drums and so on. Except for one man that I remember. [It] was Bob Wilson, who got me into it in the first place. He&#039;s sitting there moping. I said, &quot;What are you moping about?&quot; He said, &quot;It&#039;s a terrible thing that we made.&quot; I said, &quot;But you started it, you got us into it.&quot; You see, what happened to me, what happened to the rest of us is we started for a good reason but then we&#039;re working very hard to do something, and to accomplish it, it&#039;s pleasure, it&#039;s excitement. And you stop to think, you know, you just stop. After you thought at the beginning, you just stop. So he was the only one who was still thinking about it, at that particular moment. 

I returned to civilization shortly after that and went to Cornell to teach, and my first impression was a very strange one and I can&#039;t understand it anymore but I felt very strongly then. I&#039;d sat in a restaurant in New York, for example, and I looked out at the buildings and how far away, I would think, you know, how much the radius of the Hiroshima bomb damage was and so forth. How far down there was to 34th street? All those buildings, all smashed and so on. And I got a very strange feeling. I would go along and I would see people building a bridge. Or they&#039;d be making a new road, and I thought, they&#039;re &lt;em&gt;crazy&lt;/em&gt;, they just don&#039;t understand, they don&#039;t understand. Why are they making new things, it&#039;s so useless? But fortunately it&#039;s been useless for 30 years now isn&#039;t it, almost, maybe we&#039;ll make 30 years. So I&#039;ve been wrong for 30 years about its being useless making bridges and I&#039;m glad that those other people were able to go ahead. But my first reaction after I was finished with this thing was it&#039;s useless to make anything. Thank you very much.&quot;

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, Richard Feynman, as creative and ingenious as this man was, imho, must always contain a footnote (preferably in bold letters): one of the men who created the first atomic weapon.<br />
-tgs-</p>
<p>********</p>
<p>Hi Tommi,</p>
<p>You are right that Richard Feynman was on the team that created the atomic bomb. But I think we need to remember that the Germans were also working on the bomb at that time. Our world would have been very different if the Germans got there first and used it against the free world.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Kempton</p>
<p>P.S. Here is a story partially reflecting how Feynman felt about the bomb. Instead of re-typing similar passage from a different book, I am <a href="http://www.karenika.com/book/pleasure.html" rel="nofollow">copying from this blogger&#8217;s text</a>. This Feynman story is essentially the same as what I read in another book.</p>
<p>&#8220;After the thing {the atom bomb} went off and we heard about it, there was tremendous excitement at Los Alamos. Everybody had parties, we all ran around. I sat on the end of a jeep and beat drums and so on. Except for one man that I remember. [It] was Bob Wilson, who got me into it in the first place. He&#8217;s sitting there moping. I said, &#8220;What are you moping about?&#8221; He said, &#8220;It&#8217;s a terrible thing that we made.&#8221; I said, &#8220;But you started it, you got us into it.&#8221; You see, what happened to me, what happened to the rest of us is we started for a good reason but then we&#8217;re working very hard to do something, and to accomplish it, it&#8217;s pleasure, it&#8217;s excitement. And you stop to think, you know, you just stop. After you thought at the beginning, you just stop. So he was the only one who was still thinking about it, at that particular moment. </p>
<p>I returned to civilization shortly after that and went to Cornell to teach, and my first impression was a very strange one and I can&#8217;t understand it anymore but I felt very strongly then. I&#8217;d sat in a restaurant in New York, for example, and I looked out at the buildings and how far away, I would think, you know, how much the radius of the Hiroshima bomb damage was and so forth. How far down there was to 34th street? All those buildings, all smashed and so on. And I got a very strange feeling. I would go along and I would see people building a bridge. Or they&#8217;d be making a new road, and I thought, they&#8217;re <em>crazy</em>, they just don&#8217;t understand, they don&#8217;t understand. Why are they making new things, it&#8217;s so useless? But fortunately it&#8217;s been useless for 30 years now isn&#8217;t it, almost, maybe we&#8217;ll make 30 years. So I&#8217;ve been wrong for 30 years about its being useless making bridges and I&#8217;m glad that those other people were able to go ahead. But my first reaction after I was finished with this thing was it&#8217;s useless to make anything. Thank you very much.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roadblock at the U.S. Patent Office - 700,000 applications in the pipeline &#171; Kempton&#8217;s blog</title>
		<link>http://kempton.wordpress.com/2006/11/26/richard-feynman-great-minds-of-our-time/#comment-743</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roadblock at the U.S. Patent Office - 700,000 applications in the pipeline &#171; Kempton&#8217;s blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 17:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kempton.wordpress.com/2006/11/26/great-minds-of-our-time-richard-feynman/#comment-743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Incidentally, Richard Feynman studied and played in the area we now call  Nanotechnology decades before it became popular. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Incidentally, Richard Feynman studied and played in the area we now call  Nanotechnology decades before it became popular. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
